eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35

A News Letter Sign UP!
A CASE STUDY OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN A MIDDLE EASTERN UNIVERSITY

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.4 Issue 6, pp 21-28,Year 2015

A CASE STUDY OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN A MIDDLE EASTERN UNIVERSITY

Yusuf A.Al-Turki,Anwar L.Bilgrami,and Abol-Ela Said

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 25 August 2015; Accepted : 20 December 2015 ; Published : 31 December 2015

Share
Download 127
View 187
Article No. 10588
Abstract

Many Middle Eastern Universities are still struggling to establish themselves to achieve excellence in scientific research and education. The rising awareness in the science and technology, and implication of higher education in shaping future of the younger generation and building societies in the Middle Eastern region became inevitable in order to modify and upgrade educational policies and structure. The foremost step in this direction is governance that comes with hard decisions. The universities and national governments are willing to change strategic plans and institutional guidelines for the development of science and technology. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia is one of the few universities in the Middle East that rose to acquire the second rank among all the Arab and 351th among the world universities in 2014. King Abdulaziz University has tried to implement KPIs during previous strategic plan in order to achieve international distinction in scientific research and education. Introduction of KPIs helped university to grow but not as much as it was expected. The main reasons were occasional conflicts between KPIs and strategic plan of the university. The university now plans to synchronize KPIs with the current strategic plan that starts from 2016. In this paper, the authors have modified many existing KPIs and proposed others based on the university’s ideology, requirements and criteria. With its own KPIs the university will bring transparency, accountability and responsibility among its students, faculty and staff paving way to academic and scientific research development in order to be the role model for other universities in the region.

Key Words   
Key performance indicators, scientific research, university, education
Copyright
References
  1. Al-Turki & Duffuaa, S. Performance measures for academic departments. The International Journal of Education Management, 17, 2003, 330-338.
  2. R. Arber. & G. Anllo. Measuring R&D in developing countries: Measurement priorities and methodological issues in
  3. Latin America. Working paper prepared for the UIS. Montreal. http://www.uis.unesco.org/template/pdf/S&T/RICYTfinal report. pdf ., 2008
  4. Atkinson, G. Grosjenns, D. Fisher & K. Rubenson. Consequence of performance models in higher education: an international perspective. Center of  Policy Studies in Higher Education and Training. University of British Colombia. www.fedcan.ca/english/fromold/pert-ind-litteratutrereview-ubc.cfm. 1999.
  5. M. Bird. Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly. Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168, 2005, 1-27.
  6. Bond University Strategic Plan (2009). http://www.bond.edu.au/prod_ext/groups/public/@pub-market ing-gen/documents/genericwebdocument/bd3_009956.pdf. 2009
  7. Brennan. “Evaluation of higher education in Europe”. In Changing relationships between higher education and the state, Edited by: Henkel, M. and Little, B. 1999, 219–235. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  8. Braun, W. Glanzel, & A. Schubert. Scientometric indicators, a 32-country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact. World Scientific Publishing Co. Ptv. Ltd. http://books.google.com/books?id= ntwCx1B7WbkC&pg=RA1- PA416&dq=%22Braun%22+%22Scientometric+ Indicators:+A+32+Country+Comparative+ %22+&lr=&sig= W_6eoVjjPxz4iaMcoxkgqYrTXF0#v=onepage&q&f=false>. 1985.
  9. Coelho, A. Mascarenhas, P. Vaz, A. Dores & T. B. "A framework for regional sustainability assessment: developing indicators for a Portuguese region, "Sustainable Development. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18, 2010, pp 211-219. 
  10. Drucker. The Age of Discontinuity; Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper & Row. 1969
  11. Establishment of  Research University in Malaysia. http://www.econ.upm.edu. my/ 2007/pdf/rutarget0710.pdf .from the NORIA-net “The use of bibliometrics in research policy and evaluation activities”. NORIA-net Report 3. Nord Forsk, Oslo. 2006.
  12. Gaillard. Measuring R&D in developing countries: main characteristics and implications for the fractal manual, Science. Technology & Society, 15, 2010, 77-111.
  13. F. Glueck & L. R. Jauch. Evaluation of university professor’s research performance. Management  Science, 22, 1975, 66-75.
  14. Halliday, S. Asthana & S. Richardson. Evaluating partnership: the role of formal assessment tools. Evaluation, 10, 2004, 285-303.
  15. W. Kahn & N. Molotja. Measuring R&D in South Africa and in selected SADC countries : Issues in Implementing Frascati Manual Based Surveys, Working paper prepared for the UIS, Montreal. http://www.uis.unesco.org/ template/ pdf/S&T/CeSTIIfinalreport.pdf. 2008.
  16. Kamarulzaman, H. Hezlin & N. Mariati. University Research, Development & Commercialization Management: A Malaysian Best Practice Case Study. http://www.wbiconpro.com/443-Kamarulzaman.pdf. 2011.
  17. Karlsson, U. Kronman, A. Lehvo, A. Nuutinen, G. Sivertsen & O. M. Sveinsd. Key performance indicators. Lancaster University http://www.lancs. ac.uk/vc/kpi.htm. 2011.
  18. Kyrillidou. Current context for performance indicators in higher education, August 8, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.2002.
  19. Lancaster University (2011). Key performance indicators. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/vc/kpi.htm. 
  20. Leydesdorff  & C. Wagner. Macro-level indicators of relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informatics, http://www.leydesdorff. net/roadmap/roadmap.pdf. 2010.
  21. Ministry of Economy and Planning. Long-term strategy for the Saudi economy. mep.gov.sa, 2005.
  22. F. Moed, R. E. Debruin & T. N. Van Leeuwen. New bibliometric tools for the assessment of  National Research Performance – Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 1995, 381–422.
  23. Neave. On the cultivation of quality, efficiency, and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23, 1998, 7–23. 
  24. Neave. The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33, 1998, 265–285.
  25. Performance-Based Funding for Public Research in Tertiary Education Institutions: Workshop Proceedings, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264094611-en. 2010.
  26. OECD, (2006): What indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation policies in the 21st century, OECD, Paris. http://www..oecd.org/document/37/0.3343.en.2649. 34451.37083163.1.1.1.1.00.html.
  27. Pedro, M. André, V. Paula, D. Anabela & R. Tomás. "A framework for regional sustainability assessment: developing indicators for a Portuguese region,"Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18, 2010, pp 211-219. 
  28. Royal Irish Academy (2011). Key performance indicators for humanities research in Irish universities. http://www.ria.ie/getmedia/2d1c1172-fc9d-4492-aa3b-97581f10c035/Key-Performance-Indicators-2011-Full-PDF.pdf.aspx
  29. W. Schneider, D. W. Aksnes, K. L. Faurb P. Finnbj, J. Froerg, M. Gunnarsson,S. Karlsson, U. Kronman, A. Lehvo, A. Nuutinen, G. Sivertsen & S. G. Sveinsd. Bibliometric Research Performance Indicators for the Nordic Countries. A publication from the NORIA-net “The use of bibliometrics in research policy and evaluation activities”. NORIA-net Report 3. NordForsk, Oslo, 2010.
  30. Scientific research assessment and evaluation indicators (2010). Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia. http://www.mohe.gov.sa/ar/Secretariats-and-committees/ Research-centers-of-excellence/Pages/ucr6.aspx (in Arabic).
  31. Sizer. The politics of performance assessment: lessons for higher education? A comment. Studies in Higher Education, 13, 1998, 101-103.
  32. Tavenas. Quality assurance: A reference system for indicators and evaluation procedures1–53. Belgium Report published for European University Association, 2004.
  33. Woodhouse. Quality assurance: International trends, preoccupations, and features. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 1996, 347–357. 
  34. A. Wolfe & A. Salter. Science Policy Research Unit University of Sussex. A Discussion Paper Prepared for The Partnership Group for Science and Engineering October, 1997.
  35. Thomson-Reuters. World University Ranking. http://www.timeshighereducation.  uk/ world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/king-abdulaziz-univer sity, 2014.
  36. Thomson-Reuters. World University Ranking. http://www.timeshighereducation.  uk/ world-university-rankings /2010-2011/analysis-methodology.html#research, 2006.
  37. Zhou & L. Leydesdorff. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35, 2006, 83-104.
  38. G. Zimmermann. Nursing management secrets. Secret Series, 13(974), Elsevier Health Sciences, 5, 2002.
To cite this article

Yusuf A.Al-Turki,Anwar L.Bilgrami,and Abol-Ela Said , " A Case Study Of Key Performance Indicators In Scientific Research In A Middle Eastern University ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 4, Issue 6, pp 21-28 , 2015


Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.