eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35

A News Letter Sign UP!
ANALYSIS OF THE GENOTYPE X LOCATION INTERACTION AND GRAIN YIELD STABILITY OF DURUM WHEAT (TRITICUM DURUM DESF.) GENOTYPES TESTED ACROSS DIVERSE ALGERIAN LOCATIONS

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.4 Issue 4, pp 18-26,Year 2015

ANALYSIS OF THE GENOTYPE X LOCATION INTERACTION AND GRAIN YIELD STABILITY OF DURUM WHEAT (TRITICUM DURUM DESF.) GENOTYPES TESTED ACROSS DIVERSE ALGERIAN LOCATIONS

Safi Rekia,Benbelkacem Abdelkader,Bouzerzour Hamenna

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 03 August 2015; Accepted : 10 August 2015 ; Published : 31 August 2015

Share
Download 125
View 179
Article No. 10535
Abstract

This investigation was carried out to determine the adaptability patterns of a set of 30 durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes evaluated across four Algerians locations. The results indicated that yield varied widely within and between locations, and was significantly affected by location, genotype and genotype x location interaction, which accounted for 91.78, 2.06 and 6.24% of the treatment variation. Compared to the joint regression which explained only 10.13%, the AMMI analysis explained 92.65% of the sum square of the interaction and indicated that all locations exhibited high interaction and could be grouped into two recommendation domains: Khroub, Sétif and Tiaret vs Oued Smar. Bichena/Ariza2//Solga8 expressed high yield main effect, high stability, good reliability and large adaptability to all locations, while Gcn/4/D68.1.93A//Ruff /Fg/3/Mtl5 showed specific adaptation to Oued Smar location. These results indicated that breeders had the choice to select Bichena/Ariza2//Solga8 due to its large adaptation and above average grain yield against the alternative to recommend this genotype to the sub region represented by Khroub, Sétif and Tiaret locations and to select Gcn/4/D68.1.93A//Ruff /Fg/3/Mtl5 specifically for Oued Smar location. The strategy associating general adaptation to a large sub region with specific adaptation resulted in 7.16% yield gain.

Key Words   
Triticum durum Desf., AMMI model, interaction, nominal yield, reliability.
Copyright
References
  1. Chenafi H, A. Aïdaoui, H. Bouzerzour, and A. Saci. Yield response of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivar Waha to deficit irrigation under semi arid growth conditions. Asian J Plant Sci 5:854-860. 2006.
  2. Bahlouli,F. H. Bouzerzour, A. Benmahammed, and K.L. Hassous. Selection of high yielding and risk efficient durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars under semi arid conditions. Pak.J. Agro. 4:360-365. 2005.
  3. De la Vega, A.J., S.C. Chapman, and A.J. Hall. Genotype by environment interaction and indirect selection for yield in sunflower. I. Two-mode pattern analysis of oil and biomass yield across environments in Argentina. Field Crops Res. 72:17–38. 2001.
  4. E, Farshadfar, and J.Sutka. Locating QTLs controlling adaptation in wheat using AMMI model. Cereal Res. Commun., 31, 249–255. 2003.
  5. Annicchiarico, P., F. Bellah, and T. Chiari. Repeatable genotype x location interaction and its exploitation by conventional and GIS-based cultivar recommendation for durum wheat in Algeria. Eur. J. Agronomy 24: 7081. 2006.
  6. Oosterom, V.E.J., D. Klein, S. Ceccarelli, and M.M. Nachit. Genotype x Environment Interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region. Crop Science 33, 669-674. 1993.
  7. Annicchiarico, P. and M. Perenzin, Adaptation patterns and definition of macro environments for selection and recommendation of common wheat genotypes in Italy. Plant Breed., 113:197-205. 1994.
  8. Ebdon, J.S., and H.G. Gauch. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42:489–496. 2002.
  9. Samonte, S.O.P.B., L.T. Wilson, A.M. McClung and J.C. Medley. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Sci. 45: 2414-2424. 2005.
  10. Epinat-Le Signor, C. S., J. Dousse, J.B. Lorgeou, R. Denis, P. Bonhomme, P.Carolo and A. Charcosset. Interpretation of genotype x environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci. 41: 663-669. 2001.
  11. Finlay, K.W. and G.N.Wilkinson. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 742–754. 1963.
  12. Eberhart, S.A. and W. A. Russell. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36–40. 1966.
  13. zobel, R.W., M.J. Wright, and H.G. Gauch. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388–393. 1988.
  14. Yan, W. and Rajcan, I. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11–20. 2002.
  15. Fan, X.M., M.S. Kang, H.M. Chen, Y. Zhang, J.Tan, and C Xu. Yield Stability of Maize Hybrids Evaluated in Multi-Environment Trials in Yunnan, China. Agron. J. 99:220–228. 2007.
  16. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597–605. 2000.
  17. Annicchiarico, P. Genotype by environment interactions: Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO, Rome. 159 pp. 2002.
  18. Basford, K.E., and M. Cooper. Genotype 3 environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 49:153–174. 1998.
  19. Cooper, M., and I.H. Delacy. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-envi-ronment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:561–572. 1994.
  20. Lin C.S., M.R. Binns, and L.P. Lefkovitch. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26: 894-900. 1986.
  21. Luquez, J.E., L.A.N. Aguirrezabal, M.E. Aguero, and V.R. Pereyra. Stability and adaptability of cultivars in non-balanced yield trials: comparison of methods for selecting ‘high oleic’ sunflower hybrids for grain yield and quality. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 188:225-228. 2002.
  22. Shukla, G. K. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 28: 237-245. 1972.
  23. Kang MS., and R.Magari. Stable: a basic program for calculating stability and yield stability statistics. Agron. J.87:276-277. 1995.
  24. Gauch, H. G. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs, Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 1992.
  25. Irristat 5.0. Software package for windows, International Rice Research Institute, IRRI, Manila. 2005.
  26. Annicchiarico, P. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype x environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica 94: 53–62. 1997.
  27. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311–326. 1997.
  28. Voltas J., H. López-Córcoles and G. Borrás. Use of biplot analysis and factorial regression for the investigation of superior genotypes in multi-environment trials Eur. J. Agronomy 22:309–324. 2005.
  29. Vargas M., J. Crossa, V. Eeuwijk, K.D. Sayre and M.P. Reynolds . Interpreting Treatment 3 Environment Interaction in Agronomy Trials. Agron. J. 93:949–960. 2001.
To cite this article

Safi Rekia,Benbelkacem Abdelkader,Bouzerzour Hamenna , " Analysis Of The Genotype X Location Interaction And Grain Yield Stability Of Durum Wheat (triticum Durum Desf.) Genotypes Tested Across Diverse Algerian Locations ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp 18-26 , 2015


Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.