Sign In
Register
eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35

A News Letter Sign UP!
THE CAUSAL CORRELATION BETWEEN FIELD-DEPENDENCE/INDEPENDENCE COGNITIVE STYLE AND VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES AMONG IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.3 Issue 4, pp 97-103,Year 2014

THE CAUSAL CORRELATION BETWEEN FIELD-DEPENDENCE/INDEPENDENCE COGNITIVE STYLE AND VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES AMONG IRANIAN EFL LEARNERS

Hamidreza Dowlatabadi ,Mahvash Mehraganfar

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 29 June 2014; Accepted : 10 August 2014 ; Published : 31 August 2014

Share
Download 125
View 179
Article No. 10362
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the causal correlation between field-dependence/independence cognitive style and vocabulary learning strategies among Iranian EFL learners. 90 students majoring in English translation at Arak University were chosen. The participants were classified into two groups of field-dependent and independent based on the results of Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT). Then, a vocabulary learning strategies questionnaire (Schmitt, 2000) was administered. The data was analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM) statistical analysis. The results showed that there was causal correlation between field-dependent/independent cognitive style and vocabulary learning strategies. The result also revealed that field-dependent learners tended to use social strategies more than field-independent individuals while field-independent learners used cognitive and metacognitive strategies more frequently than field-dependent counterparts.

Key Words   
Field-dependent/independent cognitive style, vocabulary learning strategies

Copyright
References
  1. Ahmady, A., & Yammini, M. (2013). Relationship between field-dependence/independence and listening comprehension strategy use by female Iranian English majors. Retrieved 08 Feb from: http://www.noormags.com/view/fa/articlepage/82224
  2. Ausburn, L., & Ausburn, F. (1978). Cognitive styles: some information and applications for instructional design. ECTJ, 26(4), 337-354.
  3. Behnam, B., & Fathi, M. (2009). The relationship between reading performance and field dependence/independence cognitive styles. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(1), 49-62.
  4. Bennett, P. (2006). An evaluation of vocabulary teaching in an intensive study programme. Published MA dissertation. University of Birmingham, UK.
  5. Blanton, E.L. (2004). The influence of students’ cognitive style on a standardized reading test administered in three different formats. Published doctoral dissertation. University of Central Florida, USA.
  6. Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Iran: Jungle Publication.
  7. Carter, E.F. (1988). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive style to Spanish language achievement and proficiency: A preliminary report. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 21-30.
  8. Cook, V. (2001). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Davey, B. (1990). Field dependence-independence and reading comprehension questions; task and reader interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(1), 241-250.
  10. Ehrman, M.E., Irear, B.L., & Oxford, R.L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(1), 313-330.
  11. Elliott, A.R. (1995a). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 356-371.
  12. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. UK: Oxford University Press.
  13. Gordon, S., Bigelow, K. (1971). Field dependence-field independence in 5 to 10-year-old children. Educational Research, 64(9), 397-400.
  14. Hall, J.K. (2000). Field dependence-independence and computer-based instruction in geography. Published doctorial dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  15. Hansen, J., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning Journal, 31(2), 349-367.
  16. Hayes, J., & Alinson, C.W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51(7), 847-871.
  17. Hedge, T (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Jamieson, J., & Chapelle, C. (1987). Working styles on computers as evidence of second language learning strategies. Language Learning, 37(4), 523-544.
  19. Kheirzadeh, S., & Kassaian, Z. (2011). Field-dependence/independence as a factor affecting performance on listening comprehension sub-skills: the use of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 188-195.
  20. Khodadady, E., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Field-dependent/independent cognitive style and performance on the IELTS listening comprehension. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 622-635.
  21. Korchin, S.J. (1986). Field dependence, personality, theory, and clinical research. In M. Bertini, L. Pizzamig Lio, & S, Warpner, field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application (pp.45-55).
  22. Naimie, Z., Ahmad Abuzaid, R., Siraj, S., Shagholi, R., & Al Hejaili, H. (2010). Do you know where I can find the new center which is called “cognitive styles and language learning strategies link”? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 497-500.
  23. Nation, I.S.B. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Oxford, R. (1991). Language Learning Strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
  26. Riding, R.J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
  27. Sadeghi, K., & Poorghafour Langaroudy, E. (2012). Gender and specific cognitive/metacognitive reading strategies used by field-dependent/independent Iranian EFL learners, Dilve Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi, 1(3), 17-35.
  28. Salmani-Nodoushan, M.A. (2005). Cognitive styles as a factor affecting task-based reading comprehension test scores. Retrieved 09 Feb 2014 from: http://www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491465.pdf.
  29. Saracho, O.N. (1997). Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Styles in Early Childhood Education. UK: London
  30. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Sims, R., & Sims, J. (2006). Learning Styles and Learning: A Key to Meeting the Accountability Demands in Education. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  32. Shi, Ch. (2011). A study of the relationship between styles and learning strategies. Higher Education Studies, 1(1), 20-26.
  33. Tinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., & Paramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field-dependence-independence instructional implications. Revisa Latinoamerican depsicologia, 43(3), 497-510.
  34. Tinajero, C., Lemos, S., Araujo, M., Ferraces, M.J., & Paramo, M.F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of Brazilian University students. Piscol Reflex.Crit, 25(1), 105-113.
  35. Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1), 199-212.
  36. Varnum, M.E.W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nibett, R. (2009). The origin of cultural differences in cognition, the social orientation hypothesis, current directions in psychological science. Published online. Retrieved 04 April 2014, from: http://cdps.sagepub.com
  37. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, C.A., & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field- dependent and field –independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
  38. Yarahmadi, M. (2011). Field independence/dependence and owner ship writing differences. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(12), 2734-2735.
  39. Yousefi, M. (2011). Cognitive style and EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 70-79.
To cite this article

Hamidreza Dowlatabadi ,Mahvash Mehraganfar , " The Causal Correlation Between Field-dependence/independence Cognitive Style And Vocabulary Learning Strategies Among Iranian Efl Learners ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp 97-103 , 2014

Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.