Sign In
Register
eISSN:2278-5299

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology

DOI:10.29111/ijlrst   ISRA Impact Factor:3.35

A News Letter Sign UP!
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATIONS: CURRENT SUCCESSES AND FAILURES

Research Paper Open Access

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Vol.3 Issue 3, pp 147-153,Year 2014

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATIONS: CURRENT SUCCESSES AND FAILURES

D. Lance Revenaugh,Tyler S. Cook

Correspondence should be addressed to :

Received : 26 June 2014; Accepted : 28 June 2014 ; Published : 30 June 2014

Share
Download 125
View 179
Article No. 10332
Abstract

As one of the largest and most complex organizations in the world, the Department of Defense (DoD) faces many challenges in solving its well-documented financial and related business operations and system problems. The DoD is in the process of implementing modern multifunction enterprise systems (ES) to replace many of its outdated legacy systems. This paper explores the ES implementations of the DoD and seeks to determine the impact of the ES implementations on the alignment of the DoD’s business and IT strategy. A brief overview of the alignment literature and background on ES are followed by case study analysis of the DoD ES development and current implementation status. Lastly, the paper explores the current successes and failures of the ES implementation and the impact on the DoD’s goal of strategic alignment.

Key Words   
Enterprise Systems, ERP Implementation, Strategic alignment, Change management, US Department of Def

Copyright
References
  1. Adcock, K., Helms, M., & Wen-Jang, K. (1993). “Information Technology: Can it provide a sustainable competitive advantage?”  Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal, (Spring), 10-15. 
  2. Baatz, E.B. “Marketing Genius,” CIO magazine web page, June 15, 1996. June 27, 1998. 
  3. Boynton, A., Victor, B., & Pine II, B. (1996). Aligning IT With New Competitive Strategies,Competing in the Information Age, Luftman, New York, Oxford University Press. 
  4. Brancheau, J., &Wetherbe, J. (1987). “Issues in Information Systems Management,” MIS Quarterly, 11(1), 23-45. 
  5. Cardinali, R. (1992). “Information Systems--A Key Ingredient To Achieving Organizational Competitive Strategy,” Computers in Industry, 18, 241-45. 
  6. Chan, Y., & Huff, S. (1993). “Strategic Information Systems Alignment,”  Business Quarterly, 58(1), 51-56. 
  7. Cliffe, Sarah. “ERP Implementation,” Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1999, Vol. 77, No. 1. 
  8. Conrad, K. (1994). Measure the strategic value of information technology investments. The Sagebrush Group. Retrieved fromhttp://sagebrushgroup.com/archive19940823 
  9. Corrin, A. (2012). DoD officials cautiously tout progress in financial management reform. The Business of Federal Technology. Retrieved fromhttp://fcw.com/Articles/2012/09/17/DoD-auditability-financial-reform-ERP-GFEBS.aspx?Page=1 
  10. Davenport, T., & Short, J. (1990). “The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign,” Sloan Management Review, 11-27. 
  11. Dixon, P., & John, D. (1989). “Technology Issues Facing Corporate Management in the 1990s,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 247-55. 
  12. Earl, Michael J (1993). “Experience in Strategic Information Systems Planning,” MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 1-24. 
  13. Earl, Michael J. (1983). Corporate Information Systems Management, Homewood, Illinois, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. 
  14. “ERP/Supply Chain Research.” CIO magazine web page. (January 5, 1999). 
  15. Faltermayer, E. (1994). “Competitiveness: How US Companies Stack Up Now,” Fortune, 129(8), (April 18), 52-64. 
  16. Foster, R. (1986). Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage, New York: Summit Books. 
  17. Friedman, T. (2006). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century.  Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006. 
  18. Goff, L. (1993). “You Say Tomayto, I Say Tomahto,” Computerworld, (Nov. 1), 129. 
  19. (1993). Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Public Law, 103-62. 
  20. Hammer, M., &Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto For Business Revolution, New York: Harper Business. 
  21. Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. (1995). The Reengineering Revolution, New York: Harper Business. 
  22. Henderson, J., &Venkatraman, N. (1990). “Strategic Alignment: A model For Organizational Transformation via Information Technology,” Working Paper 3223-90, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 
  23. Henderson, J., &Venkatraman, N. (1996). “Aligning Business and IT Strategies,” Competing in the Information Age,Luftman, New York, Oxford University Press. 
  24. Henderson, J., Thomas, J., &Venkatraman, N. (1992). “Making Sense Of IT: Strategic Alignment and Organizational Context,” Working Paper 3475-92 BPS, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 
  25. Hsieh, C., Lin, B., &Manduca, B. (2007). Information technology and six sigma implementation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-10. 
  26. IBM (1981). Business Systems Planning, Planning Guide, GE20-0527, IBM Corporation, 1133 Westchester Ave, White Plains, New York. 
  27. Inspector General (2012). “Enterprise resource planning systems schedule delays and reengineering weaknesses increase risks to DoD’s auditability goals,” Department of Defense, July 13, 2012 
  28. Ives, B., Jarvenpaa, S., & Mason, R. (1993). “Global Business Drivers: Aligning Information Technology to Global Business Strategy,” IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 143-161. 
  29. Keen, P. (1991). Shaping the Future, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 
  30. Keen, P. (1996). “Do You Need An IT Strategy?” Competing in the Information Age,Luftman, New York, Oxford University Press. 
  31. Khan, Asif A; Melvin, Valerie; Barnes, Cindy B; Bird, Mark; Karls, Kristi; Holland, Michael; Yfantis, Chris ; Hattery , Maxine. (2012). “DoD Financial Management: Challenges in Attaining Audit Readiness and Improving Business Processes and Systems,” United States Government Accountability Office, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, April 18, 2012. 
  32. Kimberling, Eric C. (2006). "Aligning ERP with Your Overall Business Strategy."  Retrieved from http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/erp-roi/aligning-erp-with-your-overall-business-strategy-8747. 
  33. King, J. (1995) “Re-engineering Focus Slips,” Computerworld, (March 13), 6. 
  34. Lacy, K. (2003). “Business/IT Alignment Concerns - Ask the Expert,” CIO Magazine, June 2003. 
  35. Liebs, S. (1992). “We're All in This Together,” Information Week, (October 26), 8. 
  36. Luftman, J. (1996). Competing in the Information Age: Practical Applications of the Strategic Alignment Model, New York: Oxford University Press. 
  37. Luftman, J. (1997). “Align in the Sand,” Computerworld Leadership Series, (February 17), 1-11. 
  38. Luftman, J., Lewis, P., &Oldach, S. (1993). “Transforming the Enterprise: The Alignment of Business and Information Technology Strategies,” IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 198-221.
  39. Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier, T. (1999). "Enablers and Inhibitors of Business-IT Alignment,” Communications of the AIS, 1, Article 11, (March, 1999). 
  40. Luftman, J., Papp, R., & Brier. T. (1995). “The Strategic Alignment Model: Assessment and Validation,” Proceedings of the Information Technology Management Groupof the Association of Management (AoM) 13th Annual International Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 2-5, 1995, 57-66. 
  41. Martin, E. (1983). “Information Needs of Top MIS Managers,” MIS Quarterly, 7, (3) 1-11. 
  42. McLean, E., &Soden, J., (1977). Strategic Planning for MIS, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 
  43. Mills, P., (1986), Managing Service Industries, New York Ballinger. 
  44. Newlin, J.S. (2009). Minimizing the human capital aspect of productivity disruption during implementation of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Air Force Institute of Technology. 
  45. Niederman, F., Brancheau, J., &Wetherbe, J. (1991). “Information Systems Management Issues For the 1990s,” MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 475-95.
  46. Retrieved from http://www.orizon-inc.com/clients-success-stories-dod.aspx 
  47. Papp, R. (1995). Determinants of Strategically Aligned Organizations: A Multi-industry, Multi-perspective Analysis, (Dissertation), Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey. 
  48. Papp, R. (1998). “Alignment of Business and Information Technology Strategy: How and Why,” Information Management, 11, #3/4). 
  49. Papp, R. (2001). Strategic Information Technology: Opportunities for Competitive Advantage, Idea Group Publishing, 2001. 
  50. Perera, D. (2012). Key DoD ERPs $8 billion over budget, say auditors. Fierce Government IT. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/key-dod-erps-8-billion-over-budget-say-auditors/2012-07-18 
  51. Perera, D. (2012). Systemic problems with DoD ERP strategy and implementation, warns report. Fierce Government IT. Retrieved from http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/systemic-problems-dod-erp-strategy-and-implementation-warns-report/2012-09-23 
  52. Robson, W. (1994). Strategic Management and Information Systems: An Integrated Approach, London,, Pitman Publishing. 
  53. Rockart, J., & Short, J. (1989). “IT in the 1990's: Managing Organizational Interdependence,” Sloan Management Review, 30(2), 7-17. 
  54. Strassman, P.A. (1998). What is alignment? Cutter IT Journal. Retrieved from http://www.strassman.com/pubs/alignment/ 
  55. Trommer, Diane. “SCOR sets supply chain standard,” TechWeb News, Sept. 29, 1997. 
  56. Wen–Hsien, Tsai; Elliott, T.Y. Hwang; Jui–Chu, Chang; Chien–Wen, Lai; Sin–Jin, Lin. (2012) “Turning around troubled projects in an ERP implementation project from consultancy project leaders' perspectives,” International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 6(2),123-149.
To cite this article

D. Lance Revenaugh,Tyler S. Cook , " The United States Department Of Defense Enterprise System Implementations: Current Successes And Failures ", International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology . Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp 147-153 , 2014

Responsive image

MNK Publication was founded in 2012 to upholder revolutionary ideas that would advance the research and practice of business and management. Today, we comply with to advance fresh thinking in latest scientific fields where we think we can make a real difference and growth now also including medical and social care, education,management and engineering.

Responsive image

We offers several opportunities for partnership and tie-up with individual, corporate and organizational level. We are working on the open access platform. Editors, authors, readers, librarians and conference organizer can work together. We are giving open opportunities to all. Our team is always willing to work and collaborate to promote open access publication.

Responsive image

Our Journals provide one of the strongest International open access platform for research communities. Our conference proceeding services provide conference organizers a privileged platform for publishing extended conference papers as journal publications. It is deliberated to disseminate scientific research and to establish long term International collaborations and partnerships with academic communities and conference organizers.